<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>OSZone Blog</title>
	<link>http://blog.oszone.org</link>
	<description>The Open Source Zone weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:57:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>

	<item>
		<title>Four Big Ideas About Open Source</title>
		<description>	Tim O&#8217;Reilly: &#8220;In short, you can see that I believe that there are serious challenges to the open source model. For all its success (and that success has been world-changing), it&#8217;s important not to get complacent. The world is changing under our feet! The pendulum always swings between open and ...</description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/07/19/four-big-ideas-about-open-source/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Open-Sourcing Apple Apps</title>
		<description>	Tim Bray: &laquo;The real lesson: Open Source isn&#8217;t anti-business and it shouldn&#8217;t even impact your software revenue. As Eric Raymond wrote in The Magic Cauldron (this was before he cracked up): software is largely a service industry operating under the persistent but unfounded delusion that it is a manufacturing industry.&raquo;&#8221;
 </description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/06/21/open-sourcing-apple-apps/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Open Source leadership</title>
		<description>	Ted Leung: &#8220;I like to think of the two viewpoints this way: If you want to look at leadership as giving someone authority, then there are two kinds of authority. There&#8217;s positional authority. That&#8217;s where you give someone a title and then people follow the instructions of the person with ...</description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/06/06/open-source-leadership/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>RFQs in relationship with Open Source</title>
		<description>	Steven Noels: &#8220;Since open source is climbing up the food chain, any company, be it open source or proprietary, should be prepared to work the weights of the RF* bench. It&#8217;s only when Real Architects and Consultants will re-emerge again that buyers will be able to acquire independent and buyer-oriented ...</description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/06/02/rfqs-in-relationship-with-open-source/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Italians do IT better</title>
		<description>	Fabrizio Capobianco: &#8220;Open source also contributes to dispel myths and legends (a.k.a. common sense). I heard once a person say about his public company in the Valley: &#8216;we have an Italian CTO, it is like having a German chef&#8217; (two countries insulted in one sentence   I better do ...</description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/05/07/italians-do-it-better/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Under the Economist&#8217;s microscope</title>
		<description>	Chris Messina: &#8220;Not just like that. And not just by opening us up on an examination table, by poking at our vital organs, by studying our work, quantifying our behavior. To benefit from open, you&#8217;ve got to be open, believe open, see open, live open, want open.&#8221;
 </description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/04/17/under-the-economists-microscope/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Marc Fleury: Inspired or Crazy?</title>
		<description>	Richard Monson-Haefel: &#8220;If you respect Bill Gates, Larry Ellison and Steven Jobs for their hard-nosed take-no-prisoners approach to competition than you should add Marc Fleury to your list of inspirers. He is made of the same materia. The difference? The other guys (i.e. Gates, Ellison, and Jobs) are stuck in ...</description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/04/03/marc-fleury-inspired-or-crazy/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Open for business</title>
		<description>	TECTONIC: Open for business: &#8220;Understandably however, says Koff, many businesses are still nervous about staff participating in open source projects that might result in portions of their proprietary code being worked into open source projects and open source code finding its way into their proprietary applications. The best way to ...</description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/04/01/open-for-business/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Open Source kills innovation</title>
		<description>	Michael at SQLFusion: &#8220;In conclusion, I would argue that Open Source contributes tremendously to innovation. If only in one way, that is by pushing software vendors to move away from offering &#8216;plain vanilla&#8217; type of software and bring in new features, new technologies faster and better. The on-going catching-up game ...</description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/03/30/open-source-kills-innovation/</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SaaS vs. Open Source for SMB&#8217;s? A No-Brainer.</title>
		<description>	Zoli Erdos: &#8220;The dilemma with Open Source:&#160; a lot of good applications are available, but they are written by geeks for geeks&#8230; you really have to be quite knowledgeable to download and implement them.&#160; Example: at one of the startups I am advising I use SugarCRM over the internet. Starting ...</description>
		<link>http://blog.oszone.org/2006/03/06/saas-vs-open-source-for-smbs-a-no-brainer/</link>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
